RubyV
full deck said:I am dead wrong often enough that I am shy of professing absolute belief in anything simply because there are limits to knowledge. The best minds indeed end up framing the limitations as best as they can. I was reading a book last year by Jeremy Narby The Cosmic Serpent — DNA and the Origins of Knowledge which touches upon the limits of the current scientific method and how it sometimes can only deal with "A, B or C" choices, due to the methodology. He mentions this because the thesis of his book is quite startling and lies beyond what would be considered proper science in that he found empirical examples of intelligence and consciousness in places where science would not acknowledge such to exist. His observations remind me very much of some shamanistic beliefs, of objects having consciousness, of awareness in places that are non-human, though Narby speaks of consciousness being in our very DNA, in the cells themselves. Despite the his unusual observations, Narby is still able to recognize that the means to examine such ideas scientifically do not yet exist and would be rejected because of our current methodology. Narby understands these limits because he is a anthropologist and is concerned with the quality of thought in his work.
I find the comparisions to Narby's work interesting. Much of what Narby discusses I believes holds true with Tarot as well.
In the interest of full disclosure, Narby reached his conclusions through the use of hallucenigenics, like the shamans he was studying.
Anyway, one may argue that the vibrations people are refering to are similar to the intelligence that the shamans gathered from the plant life they were working with, since after all, the shamans state that the plants shared their knowledge with him, much in the same way that we couold say that tarot does with those who read them.