Umbrae
hunt down posts 535-541 in this thread: http://www.tarotforum.net/showthread.php?t=53571
This is what I've been hammering the shoe on the desk for about four years now.
It's about listening to that which speaks without a voice.
Reading can be, but is not limited to, analysis (which can lead to paralysis).
Just what I’ve been saying for a long time.
“In Zen, the highest order is to see the nothing. This is what meditation is about, to clear the mind of thoughts, which are ruminations of the past and also wishes for what are not there. To the Zen master, the highest order of spirituality is to be clear, to see what is before you, without the muddiness of thoughts that obscure it.” So sayeth Khatruman the teacher of madness.
Tis about reading...really reading (which requires listening - and not to the psuedo-intellectual voices).
To answer the thesis question. Put away the books. Spend time with one deck - and learn to still yourself - listen to the nothingness. Imerse yourself in it, allow it to flow over you; and work without a safety net.
That last point is important. Being a net-reader allows you to go and consult a book. Sitting face to face with a stranger is to work without a net. Work through your fears and find the stillness within – and then trust it.
This is what I've been hammering the shoe on the desk for about four years now.
It's about listening to that which speaks without a voice.
Reading can be, but is not limited to, analysis (which can lead to paralysis).
easyboy82 said:This is the big difference I always noticed between the Italian and French approach to tarot and card reading in general and the anglosaxon one. The anglosaxon one is very centred on psychology and advice/counseling while our approach is much more fortune telling oriented.
…
A reader who only focuses on your feelings, fears, blocks and so on without telling you anything about what is going to happen in the next months would never be considered a good reader here, but only a "wannabe" one who know something about the cards and their symbols and meanings but is not really capable of reading them.
Solitaire* said:I often wonder whether our way of reading over here isn't a cop-out. If by concentrating on the "feelings, fears, blocks and so on", that's not just a way of avoiding going out on a limb with any real statements about the person's past or future for fear of being wrong. To further make sure we're not held accountable for being wrong, we throw in the disclaimer about a person's own actions and other variables changing the outcome of a reading. There seems to be a great phobia of being seen as not being an "accurate" reader over here. I wonder if there's that much of a phobia of that over there or if your readers just accept that sometimes you're right and sometimes you're not more naturally than we do.
Just what I’ve been saying for a long time.
“In Zen, the highest order is to see the nothing. This is what meditation is about, to clear the mind of thoughts, which are ruminations of the past and also wishes for what are not there. To the Zen master, the highest order of spirituality is to be clear, to see what is before you, without the muddiness of thoughts that obscure it.” So sayeth Khatruman the teacher of madness.
Tis about reading...really reading (which requires listening - and not to the psuedo-intellectual voices).
To answer the thesis question. Put away the books. Spend time with one deck - and learn to still yourself - listen to the nothingness. Imerse yourself in it, allow it to flow over you; and work without a safety net.
That last point is important. Being a net-reader allows you to go and consult a book. Sitting face to face with a stranger is to work without a net. Work through your fears and find the stillness within – and then trust it.