ravenest
Greg Stanton said:Just to be clear -- the bulk of my studies were GD, which nowadays seems to mixed up an awful lot with Crowley, and my focus was ceremonial magic. On top of that, the New Age approach to magic, using GD and Crowley as a source, virtually guarantees failure. That is my point.
Welll that IS a lot clearer now. I didnt realise THAT is what you saying before.
So your bulk was GD and not OTO ... okay, that's clear now. And no, not many people are confusing AC with GD unless they actually know F.A. about the basics of the subject. And you focus was ceremonial magic (not OTO, Thelema Crowley OR magicK ... okay. ( but hmmmm).
I'm sure we all agree with your last sentance. HEAR! HEAR! A pity you didnt make those points as clear at the begining!