I wouldn't change anything.
I first used tarot just at the time I needed to. If I had tried it before then, I doubt it would have helped me, or that I would have been ready for the implications of it, or that I would have recognized the radically mysterious nature of it. Got to try the going your own way- relying entirely on intellect first and then see how totally different tarot is from the mind and ego (and that ego driven mind based stuff that people often falsely call "intuition")- and getting such strong proofs of its usefulness and truthfulness to really understand that.
Every deck I got, I got at the right time, and I like them all. My first deck remains my favorite, though.
I am quite happy with the way I approached it (or it approached me). It was the best way for me. I was not influenced in any way by anyone's "rules" about it, and I remain uninfluenced. Tarot was and is the most magical and mysterious thing in my life.
I still mostly use the books, and don't consider myself a "reader". This is pleasing to me, because I feel in touch with the heart of divination this way. I just let it tell me what it wants to tell me. It is for myself, but it is not myself, and it is in line with my desire to understand the truth of things. I may change my approaches to using tarot in the future. If I do, I'm sure the changes will happen at the right time.
I find it bizarre to hear of others' ideas and regrets about this. Such as how it would have been better to find AT earlier, so as not to feel alone. I love AT, but tarot itself is what showed me that I was not alone. Feeling alone in general has always been a given in my life. I doubt that finding AT earlier would have helped me in any way. And it seems that the people who I am supposed to be interacting with now are here now.
And the statements that people have made about feeling overwhelmed with information about tarot or feeling that they were not "allowed" to use tarot in the way which was most effective for them- I find these particularly sad and surprising. Tarot for me has been what let me navigate through things without getting bogged down in information. (I always find the admonition which is often repeated here to "journal" as amusing- I never journaled, and remember most of my readings [even one card draws] to this day. Remembering things in general tends to be a problem for me- I remember too much, not the other way around. [This is another reason why I like using the books- it becomes about the moment, and not about "remembering". I don't divine to remember, but to understand and to move into the future. "Remembering" and "examining the past" are things I do far too well.] )
And divination for me is like the anti-dogma. I never saw it as something which is a structure of people telling each other how to do things, but rather as a direct personal mystical experience.
I would urge everyone to remember that divination is not about the cards, or what people say about how everyone should supposedly use them, but about what divination points to. It points to a mystery. Each individual is free to approach that mystery in their own way.
Fulgour said:
I would have saved myself the time and aggravation
of learning the "standard" attributions for the Majors.
The Golden Dawn screwed everything up, everything...
beginning with Aleph=Zero. The whole system is wrong
and it's the one everybody reads in all the books. Why?
Aleph=One: the first letter and the first card. So easy!
I do not understand this. The Golden dawn is irrelevant to me, and I read with such a variety of decks, the idea of any one system of attributions for divination purposes being "right" I find strange.
I must say though that I do find it intriguing though that the Thoth cards work so well for me and others who I've done the calculation for as year and soul/personality cards- this does make me wonder if they might be more universally "right" for that purpose (and if so, why.)
I don't think there is a right way to practice divination. I think that it is individual. But I do wonder about some deeper more universal "truth" being hidden in the ideas of the tarot.