jmd
One of the first details that one notices in this highly literate world is the subtle difference in the very titling of this card between the two publishers:
This may not be of great significance. The middle 's' in the Dodal 'Bastons' is simply, by the way, a softening of the sound, that later was replaced by a circumflex accent upon the 'a' (not normally shown on upper case letters, so not shown on the Conver).
The end 's' shows that on the Dodal the suit is talked about in the plural, whereas in the Conver in the singular.
But let us look at the images (loaded, for convenience, on the ATS site).
<-- Dodal | Conver -->
Both cards have much in common: they each look somewhat towards the viewer's right; they both hold their Baton with their left hand, they are both similarly 'crowned', and their legs are in equivalent orientations - interestingly, each king seems to 'avoid' stepping onto the section of matting (or hole?) between his feet and throne (though on the Conver the line appears to perhaps be a shading horizontal, rather than the end of the 'carpet'.
Some of the distinctions are that the lower portion of the Baton points to below the King's left raised heel in the Dodal, whereas it points to just above his heel (also raised) in the Conver.
In the Dodal, the King's left arm (on the right-hand-side of the card) is confused: what is he doing? is the artwork deficient? is he sitting on it? On the Conver, this is 'resolved' by placing it simply on his thigh.
The backs of the thrones also show distinctions. In the Dodal, what is represented seems to be far more draped-like than the 'pillar'-form of the Conver (in fact, on the Dodal, it reminds one a little of what has at times been referred to as a 'solidified wing' by some).
The left-hand side of the chairs or thrones is a little confused in each representation, though 'clearly' he is sitting on some kind of cushioning blanket or doona-like softening padding.
In each case, he wears armour, and in each case, this is divided vertically down the centre of his chest. Both the Dodal and the Conver display a skirting and epaulette-type armour that seems relatively free to move or 'flow'.
What could be taken as a hair-matting (of perhaps metallic mesh?) on the Dodal is clearly simply flowing hair on the Conver. Similarly, the neck-ending of the armour on the Dodal seems to be more necklace-like on the Conver.
Finally, the Baton itself. Here a comparison to the other batons in each deck would also be useful. At this stage, however, let me simply note that it seems to be depicted, in each case, as a very crafted instrument, narrowing near its top, and virtually 'balled' near the bottom before its ending in a spear-like point.
So... essential characteristics, from these two, appear to be his peculiar sitting position, facing the viewer's right a little, holding his staff at an angle that may later be considered significant, armoured, and crowned above a 'floppy' hat.
Dodal: Roy de Bastons vs Conver: Roy de Baton
This may not be of great significance. The middle 's' in the Dodal 'Bastons' is simply, by the way, a softening of the sound, that later was replaced by a circumflex accent upon the 'a' (not normally shown on upper case letters, so not shown on the Conver).
The end 's' shows that on the Dodal the suit is talked about in the plural, whereas in the Conver in the singular.
But let us look at the images (loaded, for convenience, on the ATS site).
Both cards have much in common: they each look somewhat towards the viewer's right; they both hold their Baton with their left hand, they are both similarly 'crowned', and their legs are in equivalent orientations - interestingly, each king seems to 'avoid' stepping onto the section of matting (or hole?) between his feet and throne (though on the Conver the line appears to perhaps be a shading horizontal, rather than the end of the 'carpet'.
Some of the distinctions are that the lower portion of the Baton points to below the King's left raised heel in the Dodal, whereas it points to just above his heel (also raised) in the Conver.
In the Dodal, the King's left arm (on the right-hand-side of the card) is confused: what is he doing? is the artwork deficient? is he sitting on it? On the Conver, this is 'resolved' by placing it simply on his thigh.
The backs of the thrones also show distinctions. In the Dodal, what is represented seems to be far more draped-like than the 'pillar'-form of the Conver (in fact, on the Dodal, it reminds one a little of what has at times been referred to as a 'solidified wing' by some).
The left-hand side of the chairs or thrones is a little confused in each representation, though 'clearly' he is sitting on some kind of cushioning blanket or doona-like softening padding.
In each case, he wears armour, and in each case, this is divided vertically down the centre of his chest. Both the Dodal and the Conver display a skirting and epaulette-type armour that seems relatively free to move or 'flow'.
What could be taken as a hair-matting (of perhaps metallic mesh?) on the Dodal is clearly simply flowing hair on the Conver. Similarly, the neck-ending of the armour on the Dodal seems to be more necklace-like on the Conver.
Finally, the Baton itself. Here a comparison to the other batons in each deck would also be useful. At this stage, however, let me simply note that it seems to be depicted, in each case, as a very crafted instrument, narrowing near its top, and virtually 'balled' near the bottom before its ending in a spear-like point.
So... essential characteristics, from these two, appear to be his peculiar sitting position, facing the viewer's right a little, holding his staff at an angle that may later be considered significant, armoured, and crowned above a 'floppy' hat.