Langustl
I will choose a size between not to big and not to small ;-)
Just a couple of notes... if you put the title in English (which I don't imagine that you will!), it would be WomAn, not WomEn - the latter is plural.Langustl said:The deck grows as slowly as a turtle crawls in the moment ;-)). But HERE is a new card. The "Women". Hope you like it
http://www.langustl.de/lenormandgross/29fraug.html
sravana said:Just a couple of notes... if you put the title in English (which I don't imagine that you will!), it would be WomAn, not WomEn - the latter is plural.
sravana said:Also, what are those "thingies" in the water? I imagine that they are supposed to be fish, but they rather look like.... umm... male parts!
sravana said:While I like all the rest of these cards, this one seems to be almost monochromatic in comparison with the others. Are you sure it wouldn't stick out too much in a spread, due to that?
sravana said:The child card is lovely! Can't wait for this deck!
I figured you knew the diff btw woman and women, but just in case I thought I'd point it out. I'm reminded of all the Italian (???) decks that say "strenght" in stead of strength. Since English is so phonetic (NOT!!) that's an easy mistake to make.Langustl said:Uh ;-)) , interesting view, I painted a lot of fishes, but nobodody saw something like this before ...
Well, it may stick out a little bit, for me the man and the womAn are the two maincards, showing the main polarity, Adam and Eve, so they can be a little monochromatic. Even should be.
Thanks