jmd
A number of threads, including the very first Marseille thread on this card - XV Le Diable - have now mentioned that the Conver (attached - as well as some later versions, such as the Camoin) have a triple nipple on one of the smaller figures.
Mention has also been made that this is in reference to Masonry. I find that somewhat astounding, and simply do not agree.
There is a far more readily manifest explanation for this, and one that was also considered a sign of someone's pact with the Devil during former times: multiple nipples showed from whence it fed - nothing Masonic, but rather a clear symbolic depiction as to what was in popular thought with regards to such connections at the time of this deck's creation.
I realise that J-C Flornoy's sites mention this connection, but at this stage, as when I first read it when first posted on his site, simply remain unconvinced by the assertion.
Mention has also been made that this is in reference to Masonry. I find that somewhat astounding, and simply do not agree.
There is a far more readily manifest explanation for this, and one that was also considered a sign of someone's pact with the Devil during former times: multiple nipples showed from whence it fed - nothing Masonic, but rather a clear symbolic depiction as to what was in popular thought with regards to such connections at the time of this deck's creation.
I realise that J-C Flornoy's sites mention this connection, but at this stage, as when I first read it when first posted on his site, simply remain unconvinced by the assertion.