jmd
According to whom is there 'supposed' to be 613^2 angels???!!!???
The number of angelic beings, even if symbolically discussed, is not to be taken literally.
In any case, the number of angels is normally taken to be immeasurable and innumerable, rather than the relatively small number suggested by 375 769.
With regards to the listing of the Archangels, elements, and directions, there are no 'fixed' lists. Also, an Archangelic being, I would suggest, transcends an element and cardinal direction (despite its usage as such by some individuals - and usage that at any rate is at variance with other suggestions).
The number of angelic beings, even if symbolically discussed, is not to be taken literally.
In any case, the number of angels is normally taken to be immeasurable and innumerable, rather than the relatively small number suggested by 375 769.
With regards to the listing of the Archangels, elements, and directions, there are no 'fixed' lists. Also, an Archangelic being, I would suggest, transcends an element and cardinal direction (despite its usage as such by some individuals - and usage that at any rate is at variance with other suggestions).