RiverRunsDeep
Hi, Barleywine. I have a few reasons for not responding to your posts. First, your posts are quite thorough, and I feel I have nothing to add except a general thumbs-up.
Second, I think that our reading styles are complete opposites. I enjoy learning about your perspective, which I feel is based on history, tradition, and an analytical viewpoint. My readings, however, are based more on feelings/intuition/meditation, and I somehow think you would not be interested in any of that.
Hmmm, I didn't know about this, but now that I do...I think I'd be even less likely to respond to your threads. Perhaps I am irritating and irrational. How can I know for sure, unless someone else pronounces their judgement upon me?
Second, I think that our reading styles are complete opposites. I enjoy learning about your perspective, which I feel is based on history, tradition, and an analytical viewpoint. My readings, however, are based more on feelings/intuition/meditation, and I somehow think you would not be interested in any of that.
As to your posts, Barleywine, while I usually enjoy reading them (depending on topic matter), frankly, since you stated a while back that you wanted some dialogue on some cards you'd drawn, but then went on to state you had put a great deal of people on ignore, well, I didn't want to then post for nothing, in case I was on your hit list. I didn't see the point. It isn't very inviting to go look at a post, only to be informed by the poster that many people have been put on ignore in regard to the topic at hand, since the poster found their views irritating and/or irrational.
Hmmm, I didn't know about this, but now that I do...I think I'd be even less likely to respond to your threads. Perhaps I am irritating and irrational. How can I know for sure, unless someone else pronounces their judgement upon me?