This thread inspired me to put the Meneghello's Sola Busca on my list again. I dropped it last year because as a novice I couldn't place where it sits amongst the arrays of historical traditions and progressions from Marseilles to Crowly. I have no idea how to read with Etteilla or the Neo Platonic decks either but I acquired them for reference and study purposes. To remind myself that Golden Dawn is but one approach even though it is THE approach for now. The photo comparison of the original and Seven's take on 10 of wands and swords along with 7 of wands and swords peaked my interest to understand better the thinking behind the 'original' Sola Busca. When I decided to get the Prisma Vision deck I asked myself if James R Eads' style is too much Van Gogh and not enough James, I decided that there was enough James there for me to pull the trigger on supporting his kickstarter campaign. When I fell in love with the Rumi tarot I find myself asking is this 'really' Rumi, the answer is no and it still pains me to have to bite my lip as deck after deck of Rumi tarot passed me by. I fell in love with the Wild Green Chagallian deck only to pull back as I feel there was too much Chagall even though there was enough of the actual deck designer honesty in all of the cards. It is a personal thing, not a legal one. Thank you for sparking my interest to want to understand more as to why the Empress is so war like and not nurturing enough. I always see myself as a 'Female Emperor' - card wise - and someone said how outside the box that was, to me it is the most natural thing. In this sense, going to the 'original' Sola Busca might not help me 'read', as such, but it will expand my mind for sure, and in turn, hopefully expand my vision as I return to continue learning the RWS.