Debra
There is no harm whatsover in playing with ideas about the origins of tarot and tarot symbols.
I was once a Knight of Swords against crackpot claims, vague meanderings, bizarre speculations, demanding that people explain themselves to my satisfaction and account for gaps in their logic and evidence. Compared with some others, I am a poor amateur in the "pissy and sarcastic" department; but I was surely pissy and sarcastic enough.
Then I saw how pissy and sarcastic posts squashed some potentially interesting investigations.
Isn't it enough to raise questions or present reasons for doubt? And if the questions go unanswered, the doubts ignored...say "thank you, I shall pass on by"...as we do in all the other parts of the forum?
I was once a Knight of Swords against crackpot claims, vague meanderings, bizarre speculations, demanding that people explain themselves to my satisfaction and account for gaps in their logic and evidence. Compared with some others, I am a poor amateur in the "pissy and sarcastic" department; but I was surely pissy and sarcastic enough.
Then I saw how pissy and sarcastic posts squashed some potentially interesting investigations.
Isn't it enough to raise questions or present reasons for doubt? And if the questions go unanswered, the doubts ignored...say "thank you, I shall pass on by"...as we do in all the other parts of the forum?