Alpha-Omega said:
Accuracy for me is wither or not I am able to read the cards correctly and the sitter can validate the info. If the reading does not make sense to the sitter then I am not accurate in my view of the cards.
I'm with you. This is a breathtaking definition.
If you are stuttering and tongue-tied and making up meaning on the fly because you're not "getting" any, and/or if you talk to a skydiver about their phobia of heights, then we have an accuracy problem.
But also, accuracy isn't the be-all-and-end-all. Quite often people already know what's going on in their lives (it is their life, after all), so I rarely throw cards for the past and don't spend a huge amount of time on cards for the present. What does interest me, is possibilities, probabilities, pitfalls, opportunities, and their inner, emotional life.
The intention of a reading is not to map their future life out in concrete or steel, in firm structures that will come true to teh letter. The intention is to indentify opportunities, and find out how best to capitalise on them, or to identify areas of risk and work out how best to avoid them.
As I'm fond if saying, when "difficult" cards come up for clients: "I'd much rather you listened to me and did XYZ and come back in three months and tell me I was wrong, then listen to me and do nothing and come back on crutches telling me what a great reader I am!" (or words to that effect, depending on the cards and person in front of me).
So sometimes depending on the fall of the cards, I'm quite happy to look for things like the potential for accidents or arguments in someone's future, then spend time with them and the cards working out the best way of trying to make sure it *doesn't* happen.
Calculated, deliberate inaccuracy, if you will.