full deck
One difference in the Minchiate between the Marseilles pattern and various other Tarot are the two emperors - the Eastern and Western.
Based upon what research I have found, this appears to be a clear reference to the history of the Roman Empire. "Emperor" was one of the titles of the Roman Empire (Imperator, Imperatrix, masculine and feminine, respectively). The Emperor Gaius Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus (AD 240 - AD 311) is credited with splitting the Roman Empire into two halves, governed by four emperors. This Tetrarchy, or rule of four was entirely new departure from previous models of imperial government in that four emperors would rule the empire. Two Augusti would rule as major emperors -- one in the east and the other in the west. Each Augustus would adopt as his son a junior emperor, a Caesar, who would help rule his half of the empire with him and who be his appointed successor (see: http://www.roman-empire.net/decline/diocletian-index.html ).
Thus Diocletian divided the Roman Empire into East and West. This form of imperial rule became unmanageable in time, but the division of the Empire was permanent by about AD 395.
The "four emperors" are interesting, considering that
It is interesting to consider that in the marseilles pattern, there are an emperor and empress, rulers in the physical sense and their spiritual counterparts (popesse and pope), thus introducing a quartet of enthroned rulers again but this time quite different in intent than being a mere historical reference to a Eastern/Western, all-male Tetrarchy.
Based upon what research I have found, this appears to be a clear reference to the history of the Roman Empire. "Emperor" was one of the titles of the Roman Empire (Imperator, Imperatrix, masculine and feminine, respectively). The Emperor Gaius Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus (AD 240 - AD 311) is credited with splitting the Roman Empire into two halves, governed by four emperors. This Tetrarchy, or rule of four was entirely new departure from previous models of imperial government in that four emperors would rule the empire. Two Augusti would rule as major emperors -- one in the east and the other in the west. Each Augustus would adopt as his son a junior emperor, a Caesar, who would help rule his half of the empire with him and who be his appointed successor (see: http://www.roman-empire.net/decline/diocletian-index.html ).
Thus Diocletian divided the Roman Empire into East and West. This form of imperial rule became unmanageable in time, but the division of the Empire was permanent by about AD 395.
The "four emperors" are interesting, considering that
Thus the "four Moors" seem to reflect the four emperors of history as well. Most commonly known minchiate do not have the four, rather only three seated rulers (II-IIII) which vary in gender, depending upon the deck." . . . The Empress is featured as a male character, who wears a beard; this is clearly a consequence of the change occurred in Bologna, by which all the subjects from number II (the Popess) to V (the Pope), were turned into four Moors of equal rank . . ."
from http://it.geocities.com/a_pollett/cards17.htm
It is interesting to consider that in the marseilles pattern, there are an emperor and empress, rulers in the physical sense and their spiritual counterparts (popesse and pope), thus introducing a quartet of enthroned rulers again but this time quite different in intent than being a mere historical reference to a Eastern/Western, all-male Tetrarchy.