DownUnderNZer
It is my first time watching anything from her and 10 minutes in to it she is finally getting into the nitty gritty which is fantastic, but what I do not get is her reference to "other woman" and "cheating" when the sitters parents were "swingers".
No secrecy there and not really cheating as it was "consensual" between ALL parties involved. This is mentioned before the reading.
No need to refer to "other woman" at all as a HOUSE or in the extra area she sets up next to the last four as it is not about an "affair".
The reading is about a "paternity" question not anyone "cheating".
Also, the first four cards she discusses, on no houses at all she leans towards the "red haired" man being the sitter's "biological father" without looking at all areas. However, I do see "Snake" and "Heart"(if it is the card next to Snake) as cheating or an affair, but it is usually about another "woman" not another "man" and those two men cards are no where near those two cards. And again....it is not about cheating.
Where did she learn the Lenormand?
About 18 minutes in to it - she finally says "cheating" really is not a part of the reading, but why bring it up at all in the first place when those she is reading about were swingers. I feel, on her part, a bit irresponsible.
Am about to rewind and watch it again in case I missed something.....
DND
No secrecy there and not really cheating as it was "consensual" between ALL parties involved. This is mentioned before the reading.
No need to refer to "other woman" at all as a HOUSE or in the extra area she sets up next to the last four as it is not about an "affair".
The reading is about a "paternity" question not anyone "cheating".
Also, the first four cards she discusses, on no houses at all she leans towards the "red haired" man being the sitter's "biological father" without looking at all areas. However, I do see "Snake" and "Heart"(if it is the card next to Snake) as cheating or an affair, but it is usually about another "woman" not another "man" and those two men cards are no where near those two cards. And again....it is not about cheating.
Where did she learn the Lenormand?
About 18 minutes in to it - she finally says "cheating" really is not a part of the reading, but why bring it up at all in the first place when those she is reading about were swingers. I feel, on her part, a bit irresponsible.
Am about to rewind and watch it again in case I missed something.....
DND