I just checked the catalogue again and you can zoom in a bit to see the cards better.
The images seem to have a sort of photo-realistic quality. They seem less like paintings and more like collages. It kind of reminds me of the Haindl crossed with the Graven Images Oracle, if that makes any sense.
I like the concept of the deck, but I think I'll wait until I see some scans on AT before making a decision. For a deck about fallen angels, the colours seem too bright and cheery. Then again, we're only seeing four cards out of what, seventy two? I guess I was expecting something more along the lines of the illustrations in Colin de Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal, that's actually a plus with me, because I don't like those illustrations.
Does anyone else find the "selling points" for the deck somewhat amusing? I mean "angels are the new vampires" and "no other Fallen Angel decks on the market". I mean, Dark Angels sort of qualifies, right? There's also a Luciferian Tarot.
I'm probably being unfair, judging the entire deck based on a few cards. I still think the box art is awesome.
Aaaaaaand I just noticed that this is the same publisher that published "The Art of Tarot", I HATE that deck, but that's neither here nor there.