greatdane
My current deal breakers are:
Playing cards inserts. Big or small, doesn't matter. I just find a distraction as I don't read playing cards. A discreet SYMBOL in a bottom corner is fine tho. That I barely notice.
So no matter the deck, if it has playing cards on it, I pass.
Any non-traditional of the 36 cards. For example, renaming one, totally making up one, or straying from pretty much any of the traditional meanings. IF I can't look at a Lenormand card and tell what it is supposed to be, if there is a tiny snake hidden in a big scene, for example, I'll likely pass.
EXTRA cards are just fine. I personally don't use them in readings, but think it's great if someone wants to add more to give readers choices. But PLEASE give me the traditional 36 first!
Non-cohesive decks with styles all over the place. Photos, paintings, drawings, different periods. It feels like several decks instead of one.
Those are basically my "I'll Pass" deal breakers. Anyone else?
Playing cards inserts. Big or small, doesn't matter. I just find a distraction as I don't read playing cards. A discreet SYMBOL in a bottom corner is fine tho. That I barely notice.
So no matter the deck, if it has playing cards on it, I pass.
Any non-traditional of the 36 cards. For example, renaming one, totally making up one, or straying from pretty much any of the traditional meanings. IF I can't look at a Lenormand card and tell what it is supposed to be, if there is a tiny snake hidden in a big scene, for example, I'll likely pass.
EXTRA cards are just fine. I personally don't use them in readings, but think it's great if someone wants to add more to give readers choices. But PLEASE give me the traditional 36 first!
Non-cohesive decks with styles all over the place. Photos, paintings, drawings, different periods. It feels like several decks instead of one.
Those are basically my "I'll Pass" deal breakers. Anyone else?