SittingIdiot
Does any one "read" with a tarocchino deck? Decks with 62 cards that do NOT include the 2, 3, 4, and 5 of each suite?
I have started to read with Dal Negro's "Tarocchini" of Mitelli's historical deck from 1665. I really love this deck (perhaps because Il Matto, Fool, reminds me of Larry Fineberg, AKA, "Larry" form the 3 Stooges). [Il Meneghello has a nice deck, too, based on Mitelli's etchings without illumination.]
Does anyone "miss" the presence of these lesser pips?
The few readings I've done with this deck work fine. Has anyone had experieince with this or another tarocchino deck?
I have started to read with Dal Negro's "Tarocchini" of Mitelli's historical deck from 1665. I really love this deck (perhaps because Il Matto, Fool, reminds me of Larry Fineberg, AKA, "Larry" form the 3 Stooges). [Il Meneghello has a nice deck, too, based on Mitelli's etchings without illumination.]
Does anyone "miss" the presence of these lesser pips?
The few readings I've done with this deck work fine. Has anyone had experieince with this or another tarocchino deck?