imarya
I unintentionally offended someone, who not only seems to have read far more into a comment than I intended but who also seems to be over-reacting to the situation. I attempted to reconcile the situation and have concluded that my attempt was not well-received.
I did two 3-card spreads: "what did I do?" and "how do I make amends?" I didn't use positions; the best way to describe it is I thought 'him|action|me' for "what did I do" and 'me|action|him' for "how do I make amends" with the two sets of three cards interacting with each other.
What did I do?
1) Hierophant
2) The Tower
3) The Hermit
The appearance of 3 major arcana indicate that somehow I've stumbled upon something which represents A Very Significant Issue to him.
The root of why he took such umbrage with my comment lies in his need to see himself as one who ordains, sanctions, blesses and instructs others (Hierophant). While my comment sparked a great deal of upheaval (Tower) for him, I am okay with that and do not feel any need for his blessing (Hermit).
How do I fix it?
A) 8/Swords
B) 10/Cups
C) King/Coins
The presence of swords, cups and coins indicates to me that this is about an emotional response (cups) to ideas (swords) which pertain to material/physical existence (coins).
He needs to be in control (King/Coins), and perceives me as something to control (woman in 8/Swords). If I assume a submissive posture (woman in 8/Swords & Hierophant's acolytes) and let him free me from what he perceives as my blindness and wrong ideas (the blindfold and swords in the 8/Swords) with his benevolence (King/Coins and Hierophant) thereby restoring his idyllic world (10/Cups), he'll go back to feeling like all's well and he's in control of his domain (King/Coins).
Be careful, though, and think about whether this is the way I want to go (Hermit).
He doesn't care that the submission is an act (8/Swords) or voluntary (Hierophant's acolytes) or that the paradise is a construct (10/Cups). He won't feel good about the situation until he feels like he has me beneath his foot like the bear the king rests his foot upon (King/Coins).
Taken together, while this is nowhere near as big a deal to me (the cards in "my" row were minor arcana) as it is to him (the cards in "his" row were major arcana), I'm the Hermit to his Hierophant. He views himself as superior (priest in the Hierophant) and me as an upstart (Hermit); a contrast of institutionalized, academic learning to experiential learning and folk wisdom.
It's good that I'm holding this up to the light and looking at my role in the situation before proceeding, because I'd definitely rather be on my own than in bad company (Hermit).
Your thoughts?
Thank you in advance,
imarya
I did two 3-card spreads: "what did I do?" and "how do I make amends?" I didn't use positions; the best way to describe it is I thought 'him|action|me' for "what did I do" and 'me|action|him' for "how do I make amends" with the two sets of three cards interacting with each other.
What did I do?
1) Hierophant
2) The Tower
3) The Hermit
The appearance of 3 major arcana indicate that somehow I've stumbled upon something which represents A Very Significant Issue to him.
The root of why he took such umbrage with my comment lies in his need to see himself as one who ordains, sanctions, blesses and instructs others (Hierophant). While my comment sparked a great deal of upheaval (Tower) for him, I am okay with that and do not feel any need for his blessing (Hermit).
How do I fix it?
A) 8/Swords
B) 10/Cups
C) King/Coins
The presence of swords, cups and coins indicates to me that this is about an emotional response (cups) to ideas (swords) which pertain to material/physical existence (coins).
He needs to be in control (King/Coins), and perceives me as something to control (woman in 8/Swords). If I assume a submissive posture (woman in 8/Swords & Hierophant's acolytes) and let him free me from what he perceives as my blindness and wrong ideas (the blindfold and swords in the 8/Swords) with his benevolence (King/Coins and Hierophant) thereby restoring his idyllic world (10/Cups), he'll go back to feeling like all's well and he's in control of his domain (King/Coins).
Be careful, though, and think about whether this is the way I want to go (Hermit).
He doesn't care that the submission is an act (8/Swords) or voluntary (Hierophant's acolytes) or that the paradise is a construct (10/Cups). He won't feel good about the situation until he feels like he has me beneath his foot like the bear the king rests his foot upon (King/Coins).
Taken together, while this is nowhere near as big a deal to me (the cards in "my" row were minor arcana) as it is to him (the cards in "his" row were major arcana), I'm the Hermit to his Hierophant. He views himself as superior (priest in the Hierophant) and me as an upstart (Hermit); a contrast of institutionalized, academic learning to experiential learning and folk wisdom.
It's good that I'm holding this up to the light and looking at my role in the situation before proceeding, because I'd definitely rather be on my own than in bad company (Hermit).
Your thoughts?
Thank you in advance,
imarya