DownUnderNZer
I am not talking about Propaganda....just art being art or designer wear being designer wear not anyone making a "statement" of any kind with "Art".
I wanted to say in the last one: "Freedom to choose" as you have a number of "Freedom Acts" I think, so that is why I put "anything".
DND
But with the "Dixie Chicks" their lives were threatened, cds and stuff set on fire outside concert stadiums, and for about 7 years they had to drop out of sight. No work or performances all because one said:
"I am ashamed to come from the same state as our President (George Bush).
If it is a personal choice not to buy something because something in the art is distasteful - then so be it. I would be inclined to agree. Not because the Artist or Tarot Creator is a supporter of the Republicans, Democrats, or Other.
I would not stop buying Ciro's cards just because he supported Trump or Clinton.
However, if Ciro was a serial killer, different story.
My point is: It would have to be something about the person "directly" not because of who s/he associates with or not or who s/he supports or not. S/he has the right to think, feel, speak as s/he likes (as long as not too detrimental) and should be able to do so without prejudice.
DND
I wanted to say in the last one: "Freedom to choose" as you have a number of "Freedom Acts" I think, so that is why I put "anything".
DND
Yes .....but. Art isn't always just Art. Art can be provocative, it can instigate. That may be cool and creative, but it can also be used to motivate push an agenda. Political national, ethnic, religious commercial propaganda comes to mind. When that is the case then it's more than just art and as such can be critiqued from a different set of values. I'm not saying that is the case here, I'm just saying that "art is art' is a cliched expression that gives art a free pass that isn't always warranted.
Freedom from anything? I don't know, but this thread is also freedom of discussion.
But with the "Dixie Chicks" their lives were threatened, cds and stuff set on fire outside concert stadiums, and for about 7 years they had to drop out of sight. No work or performances all because one said:
"I am ashamed to come from the same state as our President (George Bush).
If it is a personal choice not to buy something because something in the art is distasteful - then so be it. I would be inclined to agree. Not because the Artist or Tarot Creator is a supporter of the Republicans, Democrats, or Other.
I would not stop buying Ciro's cards just because he supported Trump or Clinton.
However, if Ciro was a serial killer, different story.
My point is: It would have to be something about the person "directly" not because of who s/he associates with or not or who s/he supports or not. S/he has the right to think, feel, speak as s/he likes (as long as not too detrimental) and should be able to do so without prejudice.
DND, it is not petty to be cognizant of where your money is being spent. Same goes for where your spiritual energy is being spent. Earthair, just like the Dixie Chicks, has every right to spend her financial and spiritual energy where she sees fit. I think that's what this thread is about. Expressing this kind of concern. Maybe I've misunderstood your comment.
DND