Gosh ! You couldnt tell from my post I understand how Newtonian physics dont apply on this level ?
Okay, we best leave that subject alone and the one about the speed of light somehow proving .... no, back to tarot ;
People keep giving me the same example. I understand the premise - I just dont agree with it and see it as some type of cop out. As far as predicting things are concerned, I am of the old fashioned 'you got it right or got it wrong' school, that bases results on what actually did happen.
Who cares what the reason was ? (I call it an excuse actually).
If one's reading is wrong, it seems IMO a cop-out to try to bring all these factors in.
Several months back someone said; 'My reading was right, but the future changed."
It was one of the most crazy things I have read here. It wont be long I guess before it is part of the paradigm.
Watch out people - if this gets out you will loose your customers; who wants to know what the main probability of an event occurring from this one node of time is, that can change in the next moment ?
No folks - people want an OUTCOME ... not an excuse .... the excuse will work for a while, but that is not what predictive tarot seekers want.
IMO , regarding prediction, you either got it right (note tense) or got it wrong.
To tell someone "I got it right but you did ( they did, it did, the probability did, the quantum light speed did ...) something else that changed things and the outcome changed.
Do I really have to spell it out ? People that want a true prediction expect your prediction to take those factors into account and give THE outcome ... after the changes.