Chiriku
In another thread, I was asked to identify decks I regret buying. I described the
Tarot des Femmes by Peter Enghelhardt (2007; AG Muller) as an "insult."
See attached photos--fuzzy/poorly lit as they are-- for a few examples of the impudence. I didn't bother showing any of the utterly forgettable non-scenic pips cards that compose most of the Minors. If the Majors and Courts are this uninspired, surely you didn't expect the Seven of Pentacles to be appealing?
I usually think approvingly of AG Muller; they make very quality tarot decks, and their cardstock and card size are probably my favorite among mass-produced decks/publishing houses.
But this one has sat there in a plastic bin, surrounded by other, useful decks...constantly passed over yet smugly indifferent to my antipathy towards it.
I can't help but be intrigued by the bald effrontery, here.
I can't help but wonder if there's some quirky, niche use to which I can put these cards that appear designed for maximum uselessness.
.
Tarot des Femmes by Peter Enghelhardt (2007; AG Muller) as an "insult."
The Majors aren't half bad for what they are--swishy, swirly soft focus New Agey paintings--but the Minors are the biggest slap in a tarotist's face I've possibly ever encountered.
The same 5-6 paintings--most of them plucked directly from the Major Arcana--are recycled throughout the Minors, and sometimes not even with sufficient "space" between them. For instance, the Page of Cups and the Queen of Cups, and the Ace of Wands and the Two of Wands, are all essentially the Justice painting with different titles and background colors.
The Lovers--a pair of demure line drawings holding hands-- pop up everywhere, such as on the Six of Swords. And I don't mean the same characters doing something Six of Swordsy...I mean the Lovers, on the Six of Swords.
I am never one to anthropomorphize decks. But the effrontery here feels less like Engelhardt's and more like the deck's; it makes this deck seem almost human in its expressions.
They are the expressions of no one you'd want to know. They're those of an impudent trickster thumbing their nose at the reader. "You think you're special, do you? Deserving of 78 reasonably differentiated arcana? Here, try on this identical Knight and King of Cups--slightly less feminine facsimiles of the twin Page and Queen--for size. Enjoy!"
See attached photos--fuzzy/poorly lit as they are-- for a few examples of the impudence. I didn't bother showing any of the utterly forgettable non-scenic pips cards that compose most of the Minors. If the Majors and Courts are this uninspired, surely you didn't expect the Seven of Pentacles to be appealing?
I usually think approvingly of AG Muller; they make very quality tarot decks, and their cardstock and card size are probably my favorite among mass-produced decks/publishing houses.
But this one has sat there in a plastic bin, surrounded by other, useful decks...constantly passed over yet smugly indifferent to my antipathy towards it.
I can't help but be intrigued by the bald effrontery, here.
I can't help but wonder if there's some quirky, niche use to which I can put these cards that appear designed for maximum uselessness.
.