Promise
Just reading the headline pissed me off.
Tarot reader does NOT equal psychic. If you're going to write a piece about Tarot reading, then call it what it is; don't twist it around by using loaded words meant to incite your audience and cause an instant prejudice.
Second of all, her "friends" told her this "psychic" had a 100% accuracy rate and she was naive enough to believe it. Seriously, who would believe that ANYONE can be 100% successful at ANYTHING? Last time I checked, humans aren't infallible, regardless of whether you're a Tarot reader, a medium, a psychic, a stock broker, or a janitor. We all make mistakes, and no one's perfect. An educated person should be able to figure that out.
Sounds to me like she's someone who is too immature to take responsibility for their own actions and the consequences of them, and someone who was too emotionally invested to make a logical, rational decision. If she truly cared about her marriage and her spouse, she wouldn't have thrown them away based on the words of a virtual stranger. That would be the kind of thing a person would fight for if they really wanted to make it work.
"Psychics claim to be your friend and to have your best interests at heart - but it simply isn't true." I resent the hell out of that statement.
What the hell happened to journalistic ethics? Apparently this chick missed that memo.
Tarot reader does NOT equal psychic. If you're going to write a piece about Tarot reading, then call it what it is; don't twist it around by using loaded words meant to incite your audience and cause an instant prejudice.
Second of all, her "friends" told her this "psychic" had a 100% accuracy rate and she was naive enough to believe it. Seriously, who would believe that ANYONE can be 100% successful at ANYTHING? Last time I checked, humans aren't infallible, regardless of whether you're a Tarot reader, a medium, a psychic, a stock broker, or a janitor. We all make mistakes, and no one's perfect. An educated person should be able to figure that out.
Sounds to me like she's someone who is too immature to take responsibility for their own actions and the consequences of them, and someone who was too emotionally invested to make a logical, rational decision. If she truly cared about her marriage and her spouse, she wouldn't have thrown them away based on the words of a virtual stranger. That would be the kind of thing a person would fight for if they really wanted to make it work.
"Psychics claim to be your friend and to have your best interests at heart - but it simply isn't true." I resent the hell out of that statement.
What the hell happened to journalistic ethics? Apparently this chick missed that memo.