Yeah, I'm glad the mod changed the title... I nearly had a fit when I went on the other thread and saw '78 cards'.... not ready for that! ... then realised it was a different project.
RE: CARDSTOCK
as far as I can see from responses so far, with differing budgets and geographical locations, its going to be unlikely for everyone to use the same paper. (I'd have to order mine from the USA - time and money won't allow that). There are -some- common brands that are available internationally (I'd expect that Kodak or Canson make a heavyweight photo/postcard stock that would be available everywhere) but we perhaps should have established this at the outset.
So I suggest considering three alternatives (feel free to add other options, I'm just brainstorming here
1. Select a specific card type (plaincards or something from Dick Blick) and request that everyone use that, and people who don't wish to use it can give this particular deck a miss, or, arrrange for someone who -can- use that paper to print their images for them.
2. Select a specific -range- of papers, naming several specific products. (This because some products that people have mentioned are quite divergent - heavy art paper rather than card, or thick illustration board, all of which feel very different) so that we are all in the same 'ball park'. Again, people can bow out or arrange for someone to print.
3. Agree that so long as the card is over a certain weight (eg 220 GSM), any product can be used.
We must also agree on whether:
1. All cards to be computer printed
2. Cards to be computer printed but may be hand coloured with permanent medium (ie not crayon, and spray fixative to be used)
3. Cards may be produced in any flat permanent medium. (ie all 22 may be hand-drawn in ink, acrylic, watercolour etc)
My personal preference is for the third option in both cases. Ideally I'd love a deck computer printed on identical stock for reading, but I feel that is unlikely and may cause admin hassles and expense for some members - I'd hate to miss out on somebody's lovely art because they can't afford expensive stock.
I'd like to add another suggestion: perhaps we can use AT, FlickR or someone's web space to upload high-res scans of our images, so that they can be printed out ourselves to make a uniform deck for use.
cheers
Euri