Kitichi
Hello all,
I'm curious about the different ways of thinking in regards to the outcome card. This is coming more from the POV that the tarot is not about seeing the future so much as it is about guiding our malleable future. Given that, one expects that the tarot gives us advice to get us to the best possible outcome - correct?
So let's take a simple Situation/Advice/Outcome spread. When I see this, I expect that the Advice card tells me the best thing to do to get the best possible outcome, and the Outcome card tells me what to expect. However, I have sometimes gotten some really terrible outcome cards! Assuming that the reading is genuine, how does one interpret the negative outcome cards? Some options that I'm thinking of are:
- Interpret the card in the best possible manner
- Interpret the card as normal, with the understanding that taking the action prevents something worse
- Interpret the card as normal, view it as "fate" - in that the tarot already "knows" you won't take the action and thus the outcome is going to happen
- Interpret the card as normal - consider that outcome is limited to the time duration of the spread, but the action can set up for a better future, another outcome that is beyond the scope of the current spread
- Other possibilities?
I'm sure some of it will have to do with the spread itself, which may lend hints as to which interpretation to use. I feel like in one case, I got an outcome card that was pretty much the worst thing I could have gotten for that spread! But I feel like the action was leading me that way, in spite of the negative outcome, because I had to go through the bad thing in order to reach the good things months down the road. Had I gotten the more positive outcome card that represented months later, I would have felt deceived by the tarot in the week following the reading (the negative outcome occurred less than a week from the reading).
Anyway, just looking to see the various thoughts people have on the topic. Thank you!
I'm curious about the different ways of thinking in regards to the outcome card. This is coming more from the POV that the tarot is not about seeing the future so much as it is about guiding our malleable future. Given that, one expects that the tarot gives us advice to get us to the best possible outcome - correct?
So let's take a simple Situation/Advice/Outcome spread. When I see this, I expect that the Advice card tells me the best thing to do to get the best possible outcome, and the Outcome card tells me what to expect. However, I have sometimes gotten some really terrible outcome cards! Assuming that the reading is genuine, how does one interpret the negative outcome cards? Some options that I'm thinking of are:
- Interpret the card in the best possible manner
- Interpret the card as normal, with the understanding that taking the action prevents something worse
- Interpret the card as normal, view it as "fate" - in that the tarot already "knows" you won't take the action and thus the outcome is going to happen
- Interpret the card as normal - consider that outcome is limited to the time duration of the spread, but the action can set up for a better future, another outcome that is beyond the scope of the current spread
- Other possibilities?
I'm sure some of it will have to do with the spread itself, which may lend hints as to which interpretation to use. I feel like in one case, I got an outcome card that was pretty much the worst thing I could have gotten for that spread! But I feel like the action was leading me that way, in spite of the negative outcome, because I had to go through the bad thing in order to reach the good things months down the road. Had I gotten the more positive outcome card that represented months later, I would have felt deceived by the tarot in the week following the reading (the negative outcome occurred less than a week from the reading).
Anyway, just looking to see the various thoughts people have on the topic. Thank you!