ZenMusic said:
rereading Gothic by Botting ?
Another great read on Gothic is Art of Darkness ::Anne Williams with 3premises: that Gothic is "poetic," not novelistic, in nature; that there are two parallel Gothic traditions, Male and Female; and that the Gothic and the Romantic represent a single literary tradition.
Gothic lit and film is one of my obsessions and I'd like to second the recommendation for Williams
Art of Darkness, Karen... It's pretty spectacular! As is the Botting for a quick overview.
I'm over the moon about this deck, obviously! And just to stoke the creative coals, I'll just add a couple more book suggestions that I've found especially inspiring when working on Gothic projects of my own. Any of these will wind up oft-read and spark thoughts in the birthing of the
monstre :
The Contested Castle: Gothic Novels and the Subversion of Domestic Ideology by Kate Ellis (which is sort of a cornerstone classic of modern Gothic scholarship)
The Biology of Horror by Jack Morgan
In the Circles of Fear and Desire by William Patrick Day
Mazes of the Serpent: An Anatomy of Horror Narrative by Roger Salomon
The Coherence of Gothic Conventions by Eve Sedgwick
If you want more book recs, just say.
You know how much I love recommending books. And I;'m such a completist that if it's on Gothic, odds are I own it. No lie.
I'm a fierce Herzog fan (Anyone ever seen
My Best Fiend? Vicious!) and can't wait to see where you end up with these ideas.
And thank you to Greenbeans for pointing out the distinction between Horror and Terror, they are two completely different modes that often work in tandem. But for some reason, studio execs have a harder time understanding Terror as richer or more compelling. And, uhhh, I'm speaking from experience there.
Hence the botched wreck that was
Van Helsing, which in fact based on studio marketing and structure was technically an action film with horror elements. 'Nuff said!
Let me also second the vote against card-by-card art by committee. Invariably frustrating and valueless. After all, a camel is a horse designed by committee. Committees can barely design toilets. This
is a thread in Decks and not Creation, which does indicate a difference in approach. Little Buddha offered some real, fair questions and got some extraordinarily articulate answers from several sides. Notice that he made no request for "mouse in paw" edits, but did more of a thematic probing. That seems a perfectly concrete question about a "Decks" thread and the kind of spur that can be useful. And frankly if it isn't, Karen and Alex will toss it in the bin: As they
should.
Karen, you've got a big juicy ghoulash brewing here and I for one, napkin under my chin, am lining up with a stone bowl and an iron spoon for my portion...
Scion