*raises hand*
Rosanne said:
Now is the opportunity for those who asked me questions I am not qualified to answer regarding magical groups etc to ask here. See- there are reasonable, approachable people who will answer factually. Great.
~Rosanne
It was me
Thankyou, Rosanne, for starting this thread.
I approached Rosanne because we've had a few PM exchanges in the past and I find her very friendly and approachable.
My question was inspired by a couple of things - notably the heated conversation in the Appreciating Crowley thread, but also a burgeoning interest in studying the Crowley/Harris Thoth. I am possibly a bit more interested than Rosanne in delving into the depths of magical theory contained in, and implied by, the deck.
BUT
I have noted what I perceive to be a dearth of deep technical discussion in the Thoth Study Group forum, and that makes me wonder - is there a reason for this lack? Because I know there are a few people on AT who use the deck very seriously, and not just for readings, but as part of the whole worldview inherent in Crowley's work. It made me wonder why these people don't share their wisdom. I want to learn about the complexities of the deck, but having explored this forum, I keep hitting this black glass wall that deftly deflects attention deeper into the maze of mirrors which leads . . . out. Nowhere.
There are some really fantastic posts in this forum, which have highlighted to me the depths possible. I'd really like to see some more open discussion of this topic, where people like myself (and if I may, sapienza?
) may begin to learn more about the deck.
And if such discussion is not *allowed*, then I'd appreciate someone telling me that.
\m/ Kat
PS. Thanks again, Rosanne