Teheuti
I did acknowledge Butler as also creating the Court Card spread and named the book it was in. Furthermore, I explained in my book the whole weird set of circumstances as an example of how the Tarot teaches us its own truths!So if acknowledgment is to be given, then shouldn't mkg have given acknowledgment to the person who had previously done that spread of hers?
The reason an idea is seen as being original is that one person becomes more well-known for taking the same idea and actually doing something with it.
Have you even read my posts here? An idea is not copyrightable! Titles are not copyrightable (they can be trademarked). Ideas are rarely truly original.
The "big to-do" is that most people don't understand copyright (getting it mixed up with having rights to ideas). A spread may be a small thing but at what point should rights be taken seriously? A poem may also be a small thing - should it be protected?I just don't understand the big to-do about this.
Do you know that no one can use the standard "Happy Birthday song" in a book, TV, movie, etc without getting permission and paying royalties? It doesn't matter if you personally think this is right or wrong - it's the law.
It's not about a particular use of the spread, although I think it's great that someone was responsive to this situation. Kudos! Rather, it's about understanding the principles and the laws involved for future situations. It's about understanding rights and what anyone can and can't do to protect their tangible creations. It's about correcting misconceptions.And especially since the person who used it showed up and set the matter straight, removed the spread, and that should be that.