Thanks everyone for your input, it has been really interesting to see how many of you agreed on so much..
and an interesting angle to look at, That maybe we are not looking for one man but "2"
I havent come accross anything to say why they concluded that it was one man who did these murders..
other than one statement about one of the victims.. details revealed later..
that her friend saw her with one Man..
Now who is to say, that one man was not hired to do the luring. Or is just as guilty as the person who stabs and cuts, as the victims all had cuts and things taken out with precision of a butcher or doctor. The things taken out needed to be taken away without leaving a trail.
Now i know many people back then needed to know how to cut up a carcus.. Rabbit, duck Pig, chooks etc..
But also back then Not everyone did.. They went to the Butchers.
So it is an interesting angle to look at it considering 3 of us Got that 2 men were involved with Marys murder..
Are 2 men inolved in the other murders? Is Mary a victim of Jack?
Many of you thought that the first photo was not Mary at all.
and also the picture of her daughter..
and Majority believe the place pointing to her place of death IS the actual place she was murdered.
The first readings by you all has really been interesting
Because the picture of her daughter is claimed to be valid..Does this mean it is?
I think as we start to read all the murder victims that are linked to Jack.. the pieces may come together, Also if anything else comes to you about Mary in the duration of doing these readings, please its never too late to post up what you get.
it is going to be a long journey for me to try to link up police reports with what we get and the conflict we may get also..
Which is already starting to show,
Please give me another day to put the next Victims details together into one post..