pan
it seems to me the most important consideration
regarding making a deck is to represent the cards
meaning as accurately as is possible.
That in turn requires a certain amount of discernment about the assorted BS that has been created by the people who have had and influenced
tarot since its authenticity.
One of my favorite decks is "daughters of the moon
tarot." They instinctually hit upon some very very
good symbolism and the art is wonderful. They also
were cleraly oblvious to and ignorant of the Tarots actual mythical structure, which they violated in some instances rather violently.
The Daughters of the Moon is a feminsist reconstructionist deck thats trying to create
something to balance the male dominated (and lately frankly gay) decks like waite etc.
In this, they achieved the goal of creating positive feminist images very well, but, through accidental ignorance, created a deck that like i said really shouldn't be called Tarot, but maybe
"based on Tarot" or something.
In order to do a good reconstruction job, you have
to edit out christian bias, edit out bohemian bias, and edit out modern new age bias, and thats a lot of systems to cover and a lot of work to do.
(i notice a great deal of failure to accomplish this all over the site.)
Then you have to fill in the blanks created by
a whole lot of erasing, which can only be done by
learning to see the overarching pattern of the wholistic Tarot; the mythical architecture of the
16 heros, their loves, their conflicts, and their
perpetual and entirely accidental genesis of the
physical universe.
The 40 locations upon the space time wheel, the 24
evolutionary steps, ...
those patterns are larger than any one card, and
only by seeing the larger pattern can you with
authenticity fill in the blanks of any given card.
regarding making a deck is to represent the cards
meaning as accurately as is possible.
That in turn requires a certain amount of discernment about the assorted BS that has been created by the people who have had and influenced
tarot since its authenticity.
One of my favorite decks is "daughters of the moon
tarot." They instinctually hit upon some very very
good symbolism and the art is wonderful. They also
were cleraly oblvious to and ignorant of the Tarots actual mythical structure, which they violated in some instances rather violently.
The Daughters of the Moon is a feminsist reconstructionist deck thats trying to create
something to balance the male dominated (and lately frankly gay) decks like waite etc.
In this, they achieved the goal of creating positive feminist images very well, but, through accidental ignorance, created a deck that like i said really shouldn't be called Tarot, but maybe
"based on Tarot" or something.
In order to do a good reconstruction job, you have
to edit out christian bias, edit out bohemian bias, and edit out modern new age bias, and thats a lot of systems to cover and a lot of work to do.
(i notice a great deal of failure to accomplish this all over the site.)
Then you have to fill in the blanks created by
a whole lot of erasing, which can only be done by
learning to see the overarching pattern of the wholistic Tarot; the mythical architecture of the
16 heros, their loves, their conflicts, and their
perpetual and entirely accidental genesis of the
physical universe.
The 40 locations upon the space time wheel, the 24
evolutionary steps, ...
those patterns are larger than any one card, and
only by seeing the larger pattern can you with
authenticity fill in the blanks of any given card.