ravenest
I still think Thoth (as in 'A.C.'s ' Tarot) = Thelema. That's the whole essence of it and makes the deck different in its internal philosophy and magical system.
It hatched from G.D. - like A.C. did (again see the 'astrological' attributions where constellations are used in both Thoth and G.D. attributions). Some decks might 'seem' like Thoth - like for some, they might use the word Thoth or even the same titles on the cards - to the superficial observer, but the very essence of these cards is the magical philosophy behind them, I feel, and no amount of superficial similarity will make up for that.
If I had vision quest cards I would be interpreting them different from other decks. Whats the point of having a different deck (artistic styles aside) if you interpret them all the same. I definatly would not be interpreting them the samne as Thoth unless they seemed to be Thelemic ... but then again, I'm sure there would be some variation in another Thelemic deck ...
It hatched from G.D. - like A.C. did (again see the 'astrological' attributions where constellations are used in both Thoth and G.D. attributions). Some decks might 'seem' like Thoth - like for some, they might use the word Thoth or even the same titles on the cards - to the superficial observer, but the very essence of these cards is the magical philosophy behind them, I feel, and no amount of superficial similarity will make up for that.
If I had vision quest cards I would be interpreting them different from other decks. Whats the point of having a different deck (artistic styles aside) if you interpret them all the same. I definatly would not be interpreting them the samne as Thoth unless they seemed to be Thelemic ... but then again, I'm sure there would be some variation in another Thelemic deck ...