I prefer to not suggest an actual meaning to someone else's reading, so what follows is more in terms of discussing a possible suggested meaning in terms of a legal situation, without the reading-at-hand being known.
Rather, let's take it as an exercise in using that one card (in this case, the King of Cups) in the outcome position.
If using the MBTI (and various suggestive links have been made), I would personally suggest that a judgement (or decision) will be made based on what feels right about all that has been presented.
The Judge (ie, the King) is possibly here the judge him or herself, rather than the person for whom the reading is about (despite the suggestion that he is an "older male who is kind and loving to a fault").
What is more at issue, then, is not a legal point-scoring victory (or defeat), but rather that the Judge will consider what seems fairest, and use the written law to support, rather than make, ultimate decisions.
Here I am using the --FJ aspect as presented in the card. The EN-- aspect suggests that the King will not hesitate to call forth evidence that may seem very peripheral in order for insights into the situation to be gained, rather than for a meticulous study of directly pertinent 'facts' - 'facts' that are only considered such by someone else having reached conclusions.
Overall, then, this is a Judge that I would happily be judged by - even if I was at fault - for fairness to the intent, rather than the letter, of the law, as itself a mere poor reflection of Justice, seems to be at play.
A Judge that has a humanitarian impulse, I suppose.
...again, I am not here striving to do a reading, but provide some ideas for exploration into having such a card in that position for a reading of that genre.