fractalgranny
i just got this deck and find it fascinating but a bit confusing to read with. i think it's because it LOOKS like TdM or something "traditional" in a symbolic sense but it isn't. it's one thing when something tarot of the celtic faeries comes in with its own wild and woolly interpretations but another when i'm "fooled" into thinking this is the usual fare. so of course i'm intrigued but it's taking me a bit longer to read. the four cards with vacchetta's signs on it, proclaiming he's made the deck: one is an ace, the other three a deuce. hmmm. the queen of wands that acts like a queen of pentacles. the six of swords that carries much of the symbolism of a six of wands. the five of wands that shows no sign of conflict.
does anyone know how the keywords for the LS version came about? many of them make sense in terms of the images (although one has to stretch one's imagination quite a bit with the "poem" for the knight of cups), and of course many of them are quite removed from tarot 101 type keywords. i'm not quite sure what to do with those keywords. usually i try to stay away from cards with keywords but i really wanted to have this deck
does anyone know how the keywords for the LS version came about? many of them make sense in terms of the images (although one has to stretch one's imagination quite a bit with the "poem" for the knight of cups), and of course many of them are quite removed from tarot 101 type keywords. i'm not quite sure what to do with those keywords. usually i try to stay away from cards with keywords but i really wanted to have this deck