Spiritual acquisitiveness is nasty - and that is not a bit like what we are discussing, I think - people who say they want to be a shaman and a yogi and wiccan and have a bit of tantra and buddhism on a side plate with the sufi - that was the kind of thing I meant. That kind of person doesn't genuinely commit to anything.
I do agree with Lillie that people from everywhere seem to regard Stonehenge as fair game, but I also agree with others who point out that since Britain systematically destroyed so many other cultures, we may have asked for it. That said - I prefer to look at world cultures now. Dividing them up continues to promulgate our differences and lead to arguments. That said - I also agree with naneki that the main thing is to treat whatever we are looking at - and in some cases wanting to subscribe to - with respect. What I like about this deck is the respect and "genuineness" it has - though I could be wrong.....
If a shaman told me it was horribly wrong in terms of what it was showing, I would have to accept that, if you see what I mean.
What would NOT be OK would be to bang on about if the artist said that it's OK cos it's ART and their interpretation and so on. That is only OK as a line if you don't pretend it is - in this case - shamanistic.
What is even more not OK is to try and TAKE OVER another culture and then call it yours. "I read this book and it's great so now I'm a shaman cos it's really nice." Er - NO. THAT is what I'd call cultural misappropriation. For me to use a dreamcatcher because I think they work is not me trying to be Native American and misappropriating their culture; it is me having been given one as a gift and finding a genuine value in it.
And I am also with Lillie that I am not a Brit (when I am wearing that hat; I am also Canadian.) Not are Eyeties, Ozzies and Frogs any of those things. That kind of terminology is also culturally insulting.