This depends on how you choose to read.
I will say I began with the cards and a teacher, not a book... so I have always felt spoiled in that manner. A teacher is the best thing, someone who is successful... better than a book, but a book is the same idea, I guess (assuming it is a good book!).
Looking at the cards without study, to me, is useless.
But that's because I don't care to read intuitively. I try it occasionally, for fun, and I'm not bad at it. I can usually do pretty well... but, then, I still have that foundation of study and a system in the back of my head. (Probably, the only time my readings can truly be intuitive is if I draw a single card, which excludes most of the systems and analysis that usually happens instantly when I read the cards.) But trying to do something intuitively is 'shaky' -- I have no fallback, no frame of reference, nothing to ground myself with. It's not that my intuition is bad (on the contrary, I think it's pretty strong) but that, to me, intuition is too unreliable to...well, rely on.
I think for Tarot to work successfully and repeatedly, one must find a constant belief. That truth differs from person to person. Mine relies on study and on past experience, more than it relies on intuition.
Experience is best. The cards will tell you what they mean to you eventually, I believe. The new reader cannot use experience, though, so they must pick a way---study or intuition.
Ideally, they'll work on both. Balance being key.
To me, the question provokes another question, "Which beginner?"
And yet another, "What is their worldview?"
And one more, "What is their goal?"
Those questions must be answered to find the best way, the best combination of influences, to cement Tarot for them. I don't think it's a one size fits all sort of thing.