gregory
Sure - readers and readings can be wrong; I frequently am, and I don't even do true predictive readings - but equally the future is NOT predestined. We do have free will, which is why things CAN change.
People keep giving me the same example. I understand the premise - I just dont agree with it and see it as some type of cop out. As far as predicting things are concerned, I am of the old fashioned 'you got it right or got it wrong' school, that bases results on what actually did happen.
"Wisdom" often seems like magic, when it is a combination of experience, intelligence and knowledge. Tarot is never divorced from real life; it stands to reason that someone who has actually lived and has made mistakes and has had successes would be better at recognizing patterns.
People keep giving me the same example. I understand the premise - I just dont agree with it and see it as some type of cop out. As far as predicting things are concerned, I am of the old fashioned 'you got it right or got it wrong' school, that bases results on what actually did happen.
Who cares what the reason was ? (I call it an excuse actually).
I agree with you about a prediction being right or wrong, but without trying to understand why something came about as right or wrong, then there can be no progress, can there? The OP stated in her opening post that she wanted to see which topics are more likely to be wrong amongst multiple readers. She apparently does not want an explanation as to how that comes to be for people, she just wants answers. Maybe you're okay with chalking it up to "Oh well, it's wrong and it is what it is and that's all there is to it" but while I am also perfectly capable of saying, "Well I was just flat out wrong" I may also attach a "Why" on the end there to improve my methods...
There's a difference between making excuses for why a reading was wrong and trying to understand why a reading was wrong for improvement...
This whole thread is moot. It should have been a poll because it clearly wasn't intended for open thought and discussion surrounding the subject matter described in the opening post; explanations to get to the sought-after answers don't appear to be acceptable either (at least, mine aren't, even though pretty much everyone in this thread did not directly answer the questions without supplying additional opinions/explanation right along with it).
...In fact, I even stated *multiple* times i was more interested in hearing about instances when this happened rather than trying to find the reasoning behind it.
^^That's what I'm talking about.
it is only inherent that by the nature of a forum people will want to also offer their ideas behind why certain occurrences happen. as long as the orginal questions was answered, i dont believe there is anything wrong with expanding upon an answer to include ideas, etc. though the main idea when i started this thread was to get an idea of how many times certain things happened, i also made it clear (through subsequent posts) that i wanted to hear people's stories. Or i hope i made it clear. if i havent, i hope it is clear now. i have learned a lot from this thread and others have as well. so its unfair to discount the whole thread and people's input by saying its moot...