gregory
Do that. Because the book is the book from the Greenwood, altered very little, to the extent that many of the actual card descriptions don't even match the cards. (Take a look at the Archer, for perhaps the most startling example.) A very bad decision there; they should have written a book for the deck. The book makes no sense along with the Wildwood cards - which are nice cards, and very readable but, used along with the book, more than a little confusing !I love this deck, and what has helped me read with it is to ignore the LWB. The more I do that, the more the cards seem to open up.