I would welcome a debate or even argument on the subject, but if one is to enter that arena one should know well what one actually thinks ( and so actually have some valid ideas oneself about it first) and how it is working for you ... and how to answer the others points and the twists and turns as the conversation goes along.
But I am talking about an intelligent conversation, not one where the other refuses to answer poignant questions , lays red herrings all over the place, is unaware that they tripped themselves up, cant logically string together their ideas, doesn't contradict themselves, doesn't interrupt or 'invalidate' your relevant points with the assertion that your mother wears army boots and doesn't think questioning their ideas and seeking their validation of them is a personal attack on their character.
I few times I have dealt with them when actually reading (at my market stall) ... of course one doesnt have time for that then ... once there was the age old question; this guy challenged me and thought if it was true two consecutive readings on the same question should throw up the same cards. he seemed quiet smug about it and thought he had worked out a way to 'mis-prove' tarot (without even first finding out what I was doing or how I viewed it
) ... so instead of explaining all that I invited him to sit down and 'let's try it'. To my surprise (and his) a large number of cards and a few in the same place came up again (much more than when I have ever done that experiment myself). But I didnt let him know that ... I just let him go off to think about it.
Thats one of the interesting things about tarot ( and other 'related' subjects ) ... how come THAT time it worked so well ?