Eowyn
With the new one that Greggors posted, my results highlighted Self, Musical and Logic/Math.
Gardener's 8 Types Of Intelligence - Poll
Amanda
I'm different according to the link gregory posted.
Intrapersonal - 4.29
Interpersonal - 4.14
Spatial - 3.43
The scores for your other five intelligences:
Musical - 3.29
Nature - 2.71
Body Movement - 2.29
Language - 2.14
Logic - 2.14
Intrapersonal - 4.29
Interpersonal - 4.14
Spatial - 3.43
The scores for your other five intelligences:
Musical - 3.29
Nature - 2.71
Body Movement - 2.29
Language - 2.14
Logic - 2.14
Shalyn
Interpersonal
37% Logical,
31% Spatial,
25% Linguistic,
33% Intrapersonal,
39% Interpersonal,
25% Musical,
35% Bodily-Kinesthetic
8% Naturalistic!
"This area has to do with interaction with others. People in this category are usually extroverts and are characterized by their sensitivity to others' moods, feelings, temperaments and motivations, and their ability to cooperate in order to work as part of a group. They communicate effectively and empathize easily with others, and may be either leaders or followers. They typically learn best by working with others and often enjoy discussion and debate.
Careers which suit those with this intelligence include politicians, managers, teachers, social workers and diplomats." (Wikipedia)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I suck at teaching. I suck at management. I suck at politics.
I need to re-take that test.
37% Logical,
31% Spatial,
25% Linguistic,
33% Intrapersonal,
39% Interpersonal,
25% Musical,
35% Bodily-Kinesthetic
8% Naturalistic!
"This area has to do with interaction with others. People in this category are usually extroverts and are characterized by their sensitivity to others' moods, feelings, temperaments and motivations, and their ability to cooperate in order to work as part of a group. They communicate effectively and empathize easily with others, and may be either leaders or followers. They typically learn best by working with others and often enjoy discussion and debate.
Careers which suit those with this intelligence include politicians, managers, teachers, social workers and diplomats." (Wikipedia)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I suck at teaching. I suck at management. I suck at politics.
I need to re-take that test.
The crowned one
The crowned one said:
This test:
Social 4.57
NAture 4.29
Musical 4.14
math 4.14
body 4.14
launguage 3.86
self 3.43
spatial 3.14
aja
Mine was markedly different. Previously:
On this test:
Spatial - 4.57
Language - 4.29
Nature - 3.86
Intrapersonal - 3.71
Interpersonal - 3.71
Musical - 3.14
Kinesthetic - 2.71
Logic/Math - 2.29
"Just because these five are not in your top three doesn’t mean you’re not strong in them. If your average score for any intelligence is above three, you’re probably using that intelligence quite often to help you learn"
IMO, both test are good, both a bit on the short side, and combined are probably a more accurate reflection than either alone. YMMV
aja said:
On this test:
Spatial - 4.57
Language - 4.29
Nature - 3.86
Intrapersonal - 3.71
Interpersonal - 3.71
Musical - 3.14
Kinesthetic - 2.71
Logic/Math - 2.29
"Just because these five are not in your top three doesn’t mean you’re not strong in them. If your average score for any intelligence is above three, you’re probably using that intelligence quite often to help you learn"
IMO, both test are good, both a bit on the short side, and combined are probably a more accurate reflection than either alone. YMMV
yirabeth
I'm primarily Naturalist at 4.29, with Language, Self, and Social close behind at 3.71, 3.43 and 3.14 (pi - see I do know SOME math...) respectively.
......
I totally suck at Logic/Math, Music, Spatial, and Body --- 1.71, 1.57, 1.57, and 1.29...
In the overall outlook I totally SUCK at skilled professions type activity
......
I totally suck at Logic/Math, Music, Spatial, and Body --- 1.71, 1.57, 1.57, and 1.29...
In the overall outlook I totally SUCK at skilled professions type activity
zannamarie
Would you be surprised to learn my most favorite activity is hiking in nature taking photographs of what I see? LOL
4.29 - Body Movement (Kinesthetic)
4.29 - Nature (Naturalist)
4.14 - Spatial
3.86 - Social (Interpersonal)
3.43 - Logic / Math
3.29 - Self (Intrapersonal)
2.29 - Language (Linguistic)
2.00 - Musical
Since I had a tie, I did the other test as well. I have to say some of these questions struck me as being quite bizarre.
51% Naturalistic
33% Bodily-Kinesthetic
33% Spacial
29% Musical
27% Logical
25% Linguistic
22% Intrapersonal
8 % Interpersonal
I had the same top 3 in both tests.
4.29 - Body Movement (Kinesthetic)
4.29 - Nature (Naturalist)
4.14 - Spatial
3.86 - Social (Interpersonal)
3.43 - Logic / Math
3.29 - Self (Intrapersonal)
2.29 - Language (Linguistic)
2.00 - Musical
Since I had a tie, I did the other test as well. I have to say some of these questions struck me as being quite bizarre.
51% Naturalistic
33% Bodily-Kinesthetic
33% Spacial
29% Musical
27% Logical
25% Linguistic
22% Intrapersonal
8 % Interpersonal
I had the same top 3 in both tests.
Teheuti
With the new test my two highest were switched - Intrapersonal at 4.14 and Linguistic at 3.86. Naturalistic was high before but with the 2nd test was very low!
I don't really think either test is truly accurate - except that Linguistic and Intrapersonal are probably my highest areas.
I don't really think either test is truly accurate - except that Linguistic and Intrapersonal are probably my highest areas.
yirabeth
I'm going to agree with you Teheuti -- I may not be a genius but I'm managing to work my way through college, math included...LOL
Chiska
Yirabeth - I think that it isn't that one can do or not do something, it is the HOW one does something.
I was labeled early on in school as being pretty much an idiot in the realm of math. But it was HOW I perceived math that was different, not that I couldn't comprehend it. I have always tested very high in verbal things, and yet these tests don't rate me very high on language or linguistics.
I have a degree in computer engineering. In 1972, my 3rd grade teacher would have LAUGHED at that idea! Go figure.
I was labeled early on in school as being pretty much an idiot in the realm of math. But it was HOW I perceived math that was different, not that I couldn't comprehend it. I have always tested very high in verbal things, and yet these tests don't rate me very high on language or linguistics.
I have a degree in computer engineering. In 1972, my 3rd grade teacher would have LAUGHED at that idea! Go figure.
