I’m not ‘officially’ doing the IDS, although I have been using the Tarot Classic exclusively for 4 weeks now. Yesterday however, I switched to the Halloween deck (I need a more friendly face for a while
).
Something I’ve realised whilst doing my own studying is that you can only study a deck IF there’s something there to study. I don’t have the Liber T, but it obviously seems to have a consistent and well thought-out structure behind it, which if you research, will add to your readings and make you appreciate the deck more. The Ancient Egyptian deck (which I do have) was also based on research and study by Clive Barrett.
If a deck is designed with an underlying structure or thought process, then when you start doing an IDS on it, you can see patterns emerge between the cards. For example, I’m using the Halloween deck, which at first seems very shallow, but with closer study actually shows that some thought went into it’s design. The pages all have a ghost motif, the knights an imp, the queens a pumpkin and the kings a bat. Each relate to the elements (water, fire, earth and air), and therefore (in a subtle way) relate to elemental attributions. It’s perhaps a trivial little tidbit (especially compared to the intricacies of the Liber T, RWS or Thoth), but it makes the deck more ‘deep’ to me – it shows that the designer put some effort into their creation (and did their own research) and therefore it’s worthy of closer examination.
On the other hand, a deck which is just a random selection of images thrown together doesn’t really seem to have anything in there to study. When you try to journal a card from such a deck and come up with all possible meanings you get from the imagery, it can feel somewhat ‘empty’ to know that actually, there was no specific intent behind the image choices.
I’m not trying to dig at the Bosch or any of the other IDS choices – they are perfectly readable decks. But if the goal here is to do some real study of a deck – to learn all the intricacies and patterns within it’s structure, but then you realise that the deck you have doesn’t actually have any – then it’s ultimately a fruitless exercise. You get bored of it and look to another deck.
Or then again, you learn to separate the wheat from the chaff in your collections.
(ETA: I don’t mean to sound nasty or rubbish your IDSs – or make you feel that what you’re doing is pointless. It’s not. All the above is just some ramblings from my own study experience
)