The Dreamer
Oh yeah.
So that I don’t come off as a total ignoramus, I feel that I should clarify some of my statements in my previous post. (How 3-like, lol.) I posted in a hurry and The Dreamer, you are right, it is a complex system and it certainly deserved more of my energy when submitting my original post. It’s just that I got excited because I saw a post on a system that I find very interesting and didn’t have much time, so I hurriedly replied.The Dreamer said:I almost started to give an explanation in my original post, but it is a complex system, and not simply explained…….<snip>…… I have studied the enneagram for about eight years, and it is a huge part of my thinking in all of my interactions with people.
The Dreamer said:I believe that the most accurate way of finding out one's own type is to read the descriptions of the type dynamics. Most people can instantly recognize their own type (threes sometimes are an exception to that- because of the dynamics of their type, they are more "changeable" as purple scorp alluded to.)……<snip>…… Another reason is that 3's, who I mentioned before as being changeable, tend to "become" for others whatever others want them to be, or whatever is the most efficatious at the moment for achieving their goals. If you really are a 3, it might be hard for you to know what you are really like since you would be taking on other personae regularly possibly without really realizing it.
Skysteel said:It's commonly agreed that Types 3, 6 and 9 typically have the greatest trouble identifying themselves because their identities are more fluid than the other Types (their identities depend more on the external environment). Also, I agree with Dreamer that online tests are only partially useful; I finally settled on my Type after discussing it with people who knew me well.
Like Sue, I did not think of myself as being a 3 and I actually found it hard to categorise mysElf but very easy to categorise everybody else. That is because every enneagram type has its negative traits and while we readily identify with the positive traits of the type, we are more reluctant to admit that we possess those negative traits. So, I could not see that I displayed, or was not ready to admit to, the manipulation and chameleon aspects of the 3. My friend, however, was quick to type me as a 3, and provide numerous examples of both the negative and positive traits that I displayed.psychic sue said:I did the test on the site which put me as a type 3. I don't see myself like this.
Skysteel said:Also, ones Basic Type doesn't change - if you were a Type 3 four years ago, you should still be a Type 3.
Ah.......I believe that I have integrated some of the positive traits of the 6. I thought it was actually possible to move to your integrated and disintegrated types. That's what I meant when I said I'd hopefully evolved.The Dreamer said:I do not believe that people change type…….<snip>….. Within the enneagram system there is a dynamic of "integration" and "disintegration" by which the types are related- when a person of each type becomes more balanced, they take on more of the characteristics of their integration point (the integration point of 3 is 6). When a person of each type is under stress, they show characteristics like their disintegration point (the disintegration point of 3 is 9).
Wings can mislead you when you are first categorising your own type. I thought for a while I was a 4 but when I read and re-read the full explanation of types, and after discussion with my friend, it was obvious I was a 3w4.The Dreamer said:Added nuance is provided by the wing, which is what the w in 3w4 stands for. There are two numbers to the side of each number, and each person tends to favor one of those two as their secondary favored motivational type. For This adds flavor and a kind of emotional undertow to their basic type. The wing does not change, everyone tends to favor only one wing, and only the numbers to either side of each number can be called that number's wing.
psychic sue said:I suspect that everyone is a mix of all types, as you say, and also changing circumstances would affect how one behaves.
Well, I think I know where Sue is coming from. I’ve done some work with shadow sides and, we do have parts of other people in oursElf. Quite often the things that you dislike or admire in another person are simply parts of yoursElf that you haven’t yet accepted and/or integrated.The Dreamer said:One reason why people often think they identify with all of the types is that they falsely associate a few keywords which were found in a test with what the types are really like.
Is this because you are using a traditional style Tarot deck like Rider/Waite??? I am wondering how you’d go with a deck like Osho Zen Tarot?Skysteel said:Yay! (6w5)As I said, I'm a Tarot newbie; some parts of the Tarot make sense to me, some parts don't. I 'get' the Major Arcana (to some extent), but the Minor Arcana is more cryptic...the Court Cards, especially, typically elude me.
I like to over-analyse too. I wonder where Virgo is in your chart???Skysteel said:Hey, purple_scorp.
- I never really had much faith in Astrology...I'm a Sagittarius Sun with Gemini Moon, yet I am not an Enneagram Type 7 (which I believe fits with Sagittarians) and I am not even a Type 3 or a Type 8 (Fire Types) - Type 6 seems to be a balance between Earth and Air, which I suppose fits with Gemini...heh. I like to over-analyse.
-
Skysteel, this sounds like an awesome book. Sounds as though it takes you on a bit of a journey??? I must say that I wasn't particularly impressed by "The Enneagram" by Helen Palmer. Luckily, it wasn’t the first book I’d read on the subject.Skysteel said:If you're serious about getting a book about the Enneagram, I would recommend Riso and Hudson's 'Personality Types: Using the Enneagram for Self-Discovery (Revised Edition)'.
purple_scorp said:Ah.......I believe that I have integrated some of the positive traits of the 6. I thought it was actually possible to move to your integrated and disintegrated types. That's what I meant when I said I'd hopefully evolved.
purple_scorp said:Also, the way we see oursElf does change. We learn, grow, and develop over time. What if when you first categorised yoursElf you are wrong because you see yoursElf differently to what you see at another time? That's why it's beneficial to have a close friend categorise you. It removes the personal bias.
purple_scorp said:Is this because you are using a traditional style Tarot deck like Rider/Waite??? I am wondering how you’d go with a deck like Osho Zen Tarot?
purple_scorp said:I like to over-analyse too. I wonder where Virgo is in your chart???
purple_scorp said:Have you ever studied Lexigrams?
purple_scorp said:It would be interesting to discuss Enneagrams and Astrology with somebody who has intimately studied both systems to see which planet/house position rules which Enneagram type.
purple_scorp said:Skysteel, this sounds like an awesome book. Sounds as though it takes you on a bit of a journey??? I must say that I wasn't particularly impressed by "The Enneagram" by Helen Palmer. Luckily, it wasn’t the first book I’d read on the subject.
The Dreamer said:I can see most of those correlations to some degree. I believe that many cards can apply to more than one type at different times, as the types have many aspects.
The Dreamer said:I strongly disagree with "Judgement- absolution, honesty, forgiveness" for type 4, though. Maybe the most integrated 4 on the planet might approach those, but for all the others it would be closer to the complete opposite.
I wouldn't even say they're honest about themselves.Skysteel said:I completely agree - I was actually going to assign E1 to Judgement, but then I thought very Healthy E4s are more suited; of course, very healthy E4s often are E1s. I suppose Judgement represents E4s Integration; Average/Unhealthy E4s are certainly not forgiving or honest about judging people (although they are honest about themselves).