cherryberry
moderndayruth said:Again, it depends on the definition of a third party, but whomever is doing the dreaded dis-empowering & pseudo-mind-reading thing should be aware of the consequences... and there are consequences. The worst possible, in my believe, being the statement that it all is for entertainment purposes, hence everything is permitted. (Not having in mind professionals who used it as a disclaimer, its all another thing.) If its for entertainment only, and if anything is permitted - than its not a serious rapport, one (imo) is not a serious reader and can not neither expect nor deliver serious readings and results.
ETA
ok,this is only a thought I am pondering over (i am still with some of youse here, that questions pointed at non-present 3rd party persons arent ok - in my personal book) YET if the question gets asked and the cards answer....and one is of the believe that the higher self or spirit or so is the one that answers....is it ok to ask?
Maybe it does serve a purpose.
I have only started to explore it, as I am so strongly againts 3rd party reading - and then thought WHY am I against it?
What if the cards give the answer that helps the sitter just enough whats the right thing/way to react to the person?
As a preparation for the actual conversation. As once the querent had the reading they might remember it when they see the person again and react in light of that new knowlegde (consciously or unconsciously)
And that might have been the intention of the entity who provided the answers via the cards.