kalliope
I'll give another thumbs-up to the idea of a Formal Critique sub-forum that includes posting guidelines. That way the artist and the participants all know what the endeavor is about, which should minimize offense on each side. Artists who don't want to deal with reactions like "Ooohh, hate it! Ugly colors!" can post in the formal section only. Artists who choose to share in the general creation area will know to expect more of a free-for-all. Posters who want to engage only in a certain kind of thoughtful discussion can head to the Formal section. Posters who don't want any rules about what they can say can participate in the general area.
GryffinSong's suggestions may have been about art critiques, but they are very similar to how writers' workshops are run (which is what I'm more familiar with.) There are "rules" about how to structure your critique, and guidelines regarding courtesy, tact, the sort of language that's encouraged, etc. And yet honest and detailed criticism can still take place.
I think some of the problems that arise from these discussions are due to differing expectations. People accustomed to "formal critiques" because of art school or writers' workshops may be surprised and upset by super-blunt statements that aren't in the standard "constructive criticism" language. Posters who aren't accustomed to the "formal critique" techniques may feel restricted by all of the "shoulds" involved. Having a place for each of these groups to be comfortable would be great.
GryffinSong's suggestions may have been about art critiques, but they are very similar to how writers' workshops are run (which is what I'm more familiar with.) There are "rules" about how to structure your critique, and guidelines regarding courtesy, tact, the sort of language that's encouraged, etc. And yet honest and detailed criticism can still take place.
I think some of the problems that arise from these discussions are due to differing expectations. People accustomed to "formal critiques" because of art school or writers' workshops may be surprised and upset by super-blunt statements that aren't in the standard "constructive criticism" language. Posters who aren't accustomed to the "formal critique" techniques may feel restricted by all of the "shoulds" involved. Having a place for each of these groups to be comfortable would be great.