mac22
Teheuti said:I Am not sure if this makes sense, as I'm only now adding some of these implications to my chosen definition of tarot. I appreciate this discussion and everyone's ideas tremendously.
Makes good sense to me!
Mac22
Teheuti said:I Am not sure if this makes sense, as I'm only now adding some of these implications to my chosen definition of tarot. I appreciate this discussion and everyone's ideas tremendously.
Dain said:I don't have much to add, people, except to say this is one of the most amazing threads I've ever read!
Even friends of mine who have nothing to do with tarot but read this thread at my insistence were equally amazed.
One of them said he would never, ever have believed tarot readers would delve into such deep matters, in such intelligent manner with such wise insights about probabilities, psychology etc.
I'm sure they'll think differently from now on about what tarot is!
So, I guess all I have to say (other than thank you for being here) is that any discipline such as tarot that can inspire a discussion like the one you're having here is by definition "something more" than just prediction.
My Emphasis on Mary's words, and is my baseline and why I reckon Tarot works. The whole thing not overstated, nor understated and includes all our myriad approaches to the Tarot. All our skill levels is inherent here, as is our styles and our different attitudes. We can come from all different beliefs about cards and be comfortable in our chosen stream.Teheuti said:That's when I came up with the statement, "Tarot helps me meet whatever comes in the best possible way." The "whatever comes" is really important. I try not to be tied to a single possibility or limited by a single outcome (that may or may not come to pass).
I imagine this as taking a stance, as Feldenkrais describes it, in which I can use my full potential to move equally well in any direction as needed. To do that I have to come to a dynamic center and be aware of and have access to a whole range of options. Insight (versus prediction) helps me exist within a dynamic and react to each event without the constraints of expectations that may not be accurate.
On the other hand, prediction (most often as probability), can help me be aware of opportunities and of consequences to otherwise unrecognized or even unknown actions. I don't want to throw it out, but it is not, for me, the baseline from which I operate, only one of the elements with which I work.
firemaiden said:Can anything truly be fortold, ever?
What does the reader do? We try to weave meaning together from the riddles. Still, wouldn't it be the height of arrogance to think we could ever unriddle the riddler?
tmgrl2 said:An afterthought. I have told this story in another thread.
Thinking about imagery and riddles and "predictions."
Years ago, when my oldest granddaugther was about 9 or 10 years old, we played a game. It was actually a practice of remote viewing, but she thought it was great fun.
Each of us took a smallish object and placed it in a box...about the size of a shoebox...then the other had to "concentrate" and tell about the object.
Not tell what it was...because remote viewing doesn't work that way...just as Tarot doesn't necessarily say...there will be a bank robbery.
Anyhow....here are two of the outcomes I remember.
On one, I said...I see something like a cylinder..silver, turning, removable top, bright colors inside...hard, but soft, too.
When the box was opened, it was
lipstick. All of the elements were there in the "riddle" but I didn't know what it was. I couldn't "name" it.
Then Nic did one. Circle, small , hard, clear...handle, bigger, bigger.
Scratchy...
Opened the box and showed her a small magnifying glass, about size of palm of my hand, ...with a handle..all made of one solid piece of molded plastic of some sort. And it did make things "bigger."
She was delighted. She screamed. I got it!!! A magnifying glass. I don't know if she even realized she had never said: Magnifying glass. She did know it was a "hit," though, in remote-viewing terms. (The viewing window was badly scratched).
So...riddles...and then hindsight names it for us.
terri
mac22 said:In College we had a small ad hoc group [6 of us] interested in metaphysics, tarot and the Occult.....
One day I tried running some Psychometry experiments with a couple of our more skeptical members.
Psychometry is the ability to read events, history, impressions from material objects, rings, stones, keys, pictures etc. The material object acts as a catalyst or focus for the psi faculty.
I took a key off my key ring & handed it to a girl.. It was a plain key with no markings. I said tell me about where this key goes. She described the building in great detail... and then added "There is a cold, that can never get warm."
When I told her the key went to my father's mortuary -- she nearly fainted -- She was soooo skeptical she made me drive there & PROVE -THAT- key opened the mortuary... it did...
Mac22
tmgrl2 said:What a great story, Mac!! Yes...this is how we "read," I believe...I am familiar with psychometry. Remote viewing was a special interest of mine...I was even in contact with Keith Harary? (believe that is how is name is spelled) who was doing research on remote viewing and was interested in having me as a participant. It never worked out. This was maybe 30 years ago...
With handwritings (which I "read" in college)...I had similar experiences. Recently, one of my classmates sent me a "reading" I did of her handwriting, 45 years ago...and she marked it all up to show the parts that were were, as we would say, "spot on."
But, at the time...often a riddle, as firemaiden said...but in hindsight...clarity.
With tarot and the images, I find an even greater connection than I have had with any other form of ...."reading." (Sorry, Umbrae, never used toothpicks or sweet 'n' low packets...although, I do believe they work, too.)
terri