Gazel said:
That's why I like to this as a continuum or spectrum, not a "either-or".
It is popular now to see the world in terms of Black & White, that side or this side, your way or my way.
It is (for the most part) unpopular and in some cases considered unreasonable to be ‘middle of the road’.
Formicida said:
I wonder if the classroom setting might have hindered the predictive aspect of the reading. I don't do that type of readings myself, but people here always say that if you are, it's important to listen to any seemingly illogical ideas that come into your head. But even if I saw those three cards and the phrase "bank robber" popped into my head, I wouldn't care to explain to the rest of the class why I thought that Judgment, the 3 of Swords, and the Knight of Pentacles meant a bank robber. If for no other reason than that there *is* no why.
Very true. Cordite may also have been a difficult aroma to explain. Folks perhaps would react ‘as though you were crazy’ and we’ve been programmed to avoid ‘looking crazy’ at all costs.
Early on, there was a mention of
Rashamon, which if you’ve never seen – you owe yourself a favor.
Rashomon tells a story where the participants ‘know the truth’. They see the story from their eyes. Yet each is an incomplete picture of the truth. It is not until a final incomplete picture is added that truth begins to emerge.
As a predictive reader, I don’t get truth. I get snapshots. I get incomplete images. The sitter and I can then begin to put them together. But not until I speak what I see.
As a psychological reader, I don’t get the truth. I get snapshots. I get incomplete images. The sitter and I can then begin to put them together.
If we are product oriented, the power rests with the deck/reader. The reader tells. End of story. This reading is for entertainment purposes only. $40 cash check Paypal major credit card. Next. May as well add in…you are a sensitive, intelligent person. You have the ability to cope with many situations. Although you are far from a wimpish type, you are not the overly aggressive or manipulative type either. You appear to be a very stable person – reliable. Blah blah blah…
If we’re process oriented, we sit with the sitter, we discuss the snapshots. Perhaps I discuss the snapshots from my predictive point of view, perhaps then we can discuss the snapshots from the sitter’s psychological points of view. Then we can perhaps arrive at something closer to a real truth.
However as readers, especially where the craft is honed on the medium of the internet where there is no immediacy – there is a tendency to tell. The card is turned over and we ‘tell’. Or we ask, “See these three swords sticking out of this bleeding heart? What does it mean to you…hmmm?” That’s not an exploration. That’s a leading question, and is ultimately product oriented (as it places the reader in a position of power – it makes the unstated assumption that the reader knows, but the sitter does not).
Reading is an art, where we craft the conversation to encompass not only what I see, and what you see; weighted evenly and openly.
And we must both realize - that we may both miss the bank robbery - but see the stepped on sholder.